More feedback options
under review
Eben Marks
under review
sujata kakade
On behalf of partner ‘Debbie Burch’ adding this feature. Partners would like GREAT, GOOD, BAD, and TERRIBLE as they just feel that a neutral option is not necessary and want to remove the neutral option.
C
Chip Seelig
Agree 100% - providing a fourth face (or an option to add a fourth) would provide more granular insights into the CSAT rating. Is the Neutral leaning to more good than negative, or more negative than good? I just did a demo of Invarosoft and their built in CSAT offering uses this 4-option tactic and it makes a lot of sense.